Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacred Space (website)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 04:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Sacred Space (website) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article describes a website with little demonstrable notability. I was able to find an article in the Huffington Post using Google News, but the article itself only mentions the website in passing. This was all I was able to find. Checking the edit history, user:sacredspace.ie appears to have made a few edits, but these appear to be minor, so this may outrule COI. -- Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:26, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note - user:sacredspace.ie has been blocked as of some time ago. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:27, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:29, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This is a well-known and established website, and among the first to explore the use of web technology in this way. A variety of websites (parishes, educational institutions, and others) post links to it for their respective constituencies. It is apparently accessed by thousands of people a day, (presumably more during Advent and Lent) from many countries, and is available in a number of languages.Mannanan51 (talk) 04:47, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 06:49, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. In addition to the coverage already on the page is O'Sullivan, Roddy (1 March 2000), "Irish Jesuits get into spirit of the Internet.", Irish Times. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:16, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep per above. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note to closing admin DavidEllis simply votes the same at mulitple AfDs . eg [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. LibStar (talk) 01:43, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I find the reliable sources both already in the article and as identified by duffbeerforme to constitute adequate evidence of notability. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:59, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.