Revision as of 04:46, 24 April 2017 edit Hmains (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 1,214,182 edits m using AWB ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:46, 30 June 2017 edit undo Neutrality (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 165,599 edits this is their belief Next edit →
Line 27: ==Advocacy== The [[John Birch Society]] recognizes the ASRA as a reflection of its efforts since 1962 toward U.S. withdrawal.<ref name=smith/> Their publication ''New American'' sees [[Nathan Tabor]]'s anti-UN book, ''The Beast on the East River'', as a building block toward ASRA passage,<ref>{{cite news\|url=http://www.thenewamerican.com/node/2106\|title=Stalking the Beast\|date=2006-12-11\|accessdate=2008-04-11\|author=Behreandt, Dennis\|work=[[New American]]}}</ref> ~~which~~and itadvocate ~~advocates~~U.S. withdrawal from the UN because of their belief that "the U.S. military is currently being used as the enforcement arm of the United Nations."<ref>{{cite news\|url=http://www.thefreelibrary.com/U.S.+defenders+or+UN+enforcers%3F+The+U.S.+military+is+currently+being...-a0133014519\|title=U.S. defenders or UN enforcers? The U.S. military is currently being used as the enforcement arm of the United Nations. America's Armed Forces must be restored to their only proper role: national defense.\|date=2005-05-30\|accessdate=2008-04-11\|work=[[New American]]\|author=McManus, John F}}</ref> In 2000, [[Tom DeWeese]]'s American Policy Center said it delivered to Congress more than 300,000 signatures from petitions in support of the Act.<ref>{{cite news\|url=http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=VA&p_theme=va&p_action=search&p_text_direct-0=0F74ABEA9FBF6CC1\|title=Petitioners want U.S. out of U.N.\|date=2000-09-08\|accessdate=2008-04-14\|work=[[Victoria, Texas\|Victoria Advocate]]\|author=Bowen, Greg\|page=1A}}</ref>

American Sovereignty Restoration Act: Difference between revisions

zproxy.org