Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of non-English versions of Family Guy
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 21:23, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- List of non-English versions of Family Guy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unnotable and insignificant list of random, almost entirely unnotable voice actors used to dub the series in other languages. Gives WP:UNDUE weight to secondary translations of the series, fails WP:N as there is nothing notable about this series airing in other countries (extremely common), and almost completely unsourced which depending on ones point of view could be seen as a WP:BLP violation as some may see it as insulting to be associated with a series. Further, such extensive details on foreign adaptations are not part of any properly done television article, which at most would mention (with reliable sourcing) that it was broadcast. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:44, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Notability and significance is a matter of opinion, although there is no comparison between this article and the other nomination, about The Simpsons. This may be more appropriate for the entertainment wiki, although voice actors are not inherently "non-notable". I'd prefer redlinks within an article of this nature, rather than attempts to make articles about each individual person. I'd say I'm more along the line of WP:IDONTLIKEIT rather than WP:ILIKEIT, but Family Guy has a devoted following, and others may see more value in the article. Mandsford (talk) 17:07, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unless one can provide evidence for independent notability of the dubs, list of voice actors in other languages are best left to the article in the appropriate language wiki (e.g., fr.wiki for the French version, etc.).--137.122.49.102 (talk) 18:06, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not at all sure how that's best. Most of us don't know enough French to read the French wikipedia. Mandsford (talk) 21:40, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Just as with the following nomination. The coverage of Wikipedia is world wide; since the basic version is of course the English, this is a suitable way to summarize the rest of it. The French and other WPs give a very clear list of whom the voice actors in those versions are, and I think we can use them for this,--this is essentially just a translation of that part of the articles. DGG ( talk ) 04:49, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Per DGG. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 20:15, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per above. --Saint Pedrolas J. Hohohohohoh merry christmas 23:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Could use some improvement but there's a good deal of source discussion about this. Cirt (talk) 02:21, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.