Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
~~~~ |
||
Line 348:
'parents: the grandmother was a parent, the neightbours dancing in the street were presumably parents of the other children who were also being told about there 'bright' future, the father was in prison for blowing something up. bus: no it doesn't say what he blew up, but it always seems to be buses, so this can be infered.
::No, the grandmother isn't a parent; she's a grandparent. And the other point still stands. [[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]] ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Μελ Ετητης</font>)]] 08:47, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
:::a grandparent is a parent, in name and role, at least in the middle east, but anyway, if you wish to change it to grandparent, fine. Nevertheless, the neighbours (presumably parents) danced about their own children, says the tract. And what other point stands, any why? You see, we can debate points in turn, but let's get the page unprotected and move on...[[User:10001|10001]] 11:04, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
: "''The Catholic Church created communism so that later it could destroy it...''" - already dealt with.
'"t the Vatican had to create a common enemy for both Catholics and Protestants to unite against" from the article; other places it says catholism started communism - a jesuit helped carl marx. I think the ref. is valid[[User:10001|10001]] 04:53, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
| |||